You getting all these addresses down Phill?
Yep, keep em coming.
Co-Creator of MacHeist, Clear, Partner at tap tap tap | follow me on twitter
I would greatly appreciate an invite.
grno74 [at] gmail [dot] com
Cheers!
"I'm not tempted to write a song about George W.Bush. I couldn't figure out what sort of song I would write. That's the problem: I don't want to satirise George Bush and his puppeteers, I want to vaporise them ... And that's not funny." - Tom Lehrer
How many others check all the new posts on this thread only to be dissapointed that the new posts are not new teasers, but rather new people wanting in on it?
Man, my thoughts exactly.
I must be checking this at least twice a day now. ![]()
Pretty please Phill! We're starving here!
How long wph is a moderator? Now half of posts on this thread are belong to moderator.
How long wph is a moderator? Now half of posts on this thread are belong to moderator.
All of posts are belong to us [mods]. And finally, In soviet Ukraine, spam deletes mods!!!
----
Please Phill, more spoilers?
Han shot first.
Hang on tight guys, I'll have some new stuff to share soon.
Co-Creator of MacHeist, Clear, Partner at tap tap tap | follow me on twitter

This isn't what I was talking about earlier either.
Co-Creator of MacHeist, Clear, Partner at tap tap tap | follow me on twitter
mathgamehouse.com?
From my blog about page:
The summer of my high school freshman year, my dad bet me that he could make a game like Diablo 2 (which I was currently addicted to) in a week. We ended up working together, him coding and me on graphics side by side for a couple of weeks, and the result was myPong. Since we already had a host set up for my mom's math tutoring program (Math Game House), we took over the website to use as a front to our software, and released version 1.0. Because of the barren software landscape at the time, (Mac OS 10.0, Woohoo!) myPong was even eventually featured on TechTV's "The Screensavers". I still remember the look of utter disinterest on Leo Laporte's face as the (extremely nice) Mac person, Kate Botello, demoed our game.
The next summer, we worked on a networked collaborative word processor called iStorm, which, for the record, came out well before the now popular SubEthaEdit. However, not too long after its release, I was fired by my dad for conflicting opinions. (Mostly he didn't care about UI too much, and I did.)
Co-Creator of MacHeist, Clear, Partner at tap tap tap | follow me on twitter
Hang on tight guys, I'll have some new stuff to share soon.
I recall reading that Heist 6 was going to be "soon" too....
http://www.mathgamehouse.com/images/trophies.png
This isn't what I was talking about earlier either.
So we get prizes or recognition for something?
phillryu wrote:Hang on tight guys, I'll have some new stuff to share soon.
I recall reading that Heist 6 was going to be "soon" too....
Pwned! ![]()
phillryu wrote:Hang on tight guys, I'll have some new stuff to share soon.
I recall reading that Heist 6 was going to be "soon" too....
Um... do you realize that he "shared his new stuff" about 7 hours and 34 minutes after saying that?
EDIT: the term "groupthink" seems to have negative connotations.
Sign me up too: phil.decker at gmail dot com Thanks!
EDIT: the term "groupthink" seems to have negative connotations.
A very appropriate term for web 2.0 in general, if you ask me.
Cypy wrote:EDIT: the term "groupthink" seems to have negative connotations.
A very appropriate term for web 2.0 in general, if you ask me.
LOL, very true.
Typical web 2.0 "development":
1. Find something that's been done before, but tell everyone it's new, and laugh as they believe you like sheep follow each other off a cliff.
2. Pick an over hyped, flavor of the month development platform to use
3. ????
4. Make no profit, and go out of business within two years. Sounds very 1999/Web 1.0 if you ask me.
Vitamin C Power!
Typical web 2.0 "development":
1. Find something that's been done before, but tell everyone it's new, and laugh as they believe you like sheep follow each other off a cliff.
2. Pick an over hyped, flavor of the month development platform to use
3. Call it iHeist
4. Make no profit, and go out of business within two years. Sounds very 1999/Web 1.0 if you ask me.
Heh, take a look at your signature and realize that you are advertising this very thing...
ktx wrote:Typical web 2.0 "development":
1. Find something that's been done before, but tell everyone it's new, and laugh as they believe you like sheep follow each other off a cliff.
2. Pick an over hyped, flavor of the month development platform to use
3. Call it iHeist
4. Make no profit, and go out of business within two years. Sounds very 1999/Web 1.0 if you ask me.Heh, take a look at your signature and realize that you are advertising this very thing...
Lolol especially No. 4.
Han shot first.
ktx wrote:Typical web 2.0 "development":
1. Find something that's been done before, but tell everyone it's new, and laugh as they believe you like sheep follow each other off a cliff.
2. Pick an over hyped, flavor of the month development platform to use
3. Call it iHeist
4. Make no profit, and go out of business within two years. Sounds very 1999/Web 1.0 if you ask me.Heh, take a look at your signature and realize that you are advertising this very thing...
Actually no; iHeist is not really a business venture , nor does it claim to be something new or "web 2.0". iHeist is just a for-fun project being run by a couple of hobbyists and they asked me to help them get the word out a little bit.
![]()
Vitamin C Power!
alej744 wrote:Weeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!
Please refrain from "spamming" this thread... please.
I get so worked up whenever someone posts here.
post
Cypy wrote:EDIT: the term "groupthink" seems to have negative connotations.
A very appropriate term for web 2.0 in general, if you ask me.
Took a while for one of you guys to look that up.
Don't worry, it's a tongue in cheek codename for now.
Co-Creator of MacHeist, Clear, Partner at tap tap tap | follow me on twitter
mdmunoz wrote:Cypy wrote:EDIT: the term "groupthink" seems to have negative connotations.
A very appropriate term for web 2.0 in general, if you ask me.
Took a while for one of you guys to look that up.
Don't worry, it's a tongue in cheek codename for now.
So this website won't make us stumble blindly after the group in a sort of "cult" following?
Good.
phillryu wrote:mdmunoz wrote:A very appropriate term for web 2.0 in general, if you ask me.
Took a while for one of you guys to look that up.
Don't worry, it's a tongue in cheek codename for now.
So this website won't make us stumble blindly after the group in a sort of "cult" following?
Ahem...... I think thats exactly what we do already ![]()
Han shot first.
would you guys possible be behind
groupthink.com???
hope not, seeing as it doesn't look very promising.......