1
7
0
6
6
7
8
Agents
Forums
WAWHeist
Page 1
Hi,
This heist originated over at WasteAWeekend - so use this link. Thanks!
http://www.wasteaweekend.com/forum/inde … opic=975.0
Ted
January 3, 2007 11:59 am
I'll move the discussion to a different website soon so you can participate.
January 5, 2007 3:50 pm
OK - some news! It's now called AppQuest and if you want to help please PM me for the new forum address that you will be able to register for. Can't post it here for obvious reasons!
January 18, 2007 6:16 pm
i Pm'ed you. And....
January 18, 2007 6:56 pm
It's not finished - that site is there for coding. Anyway, Leo Mancini is designing it soon......
January 19, 2007 7:28 am
WAW is not letting anyone in. Not my fault/problem.
And the site that is at appquest.org is being coded - Leo Mancini is actually designing it later.
January 19, 2007 8:48 pm
January 19, 2007 11:33 pm
tedwinder wrote:
Nott my site. And we have BIG news....
So it's not your site, but you say "we have BIG news"... Yeah... Have you posted anything here that doesn't relate to WAW?
Back on my two feet
January 20, 2007 12:12 am
I think that's actually a really great concept, Ted. I like the idea of the point system. TO be honest, the only application given away at MacHeist I've been regularly using is iPulse; I've played around with MacPilot a few times as well. But if MacHeist had a few more apps and a point system instead, I'm sure we all would have gotten apps we use more often. I wish you and your team luck with this project!
Vitamin C Power!
January 20, 2007 12:27 am
OK. I'm afraid I can't tell you yet. But its to do with merging.....
January 20, 2007 8:48 am
Sorry, I would, but I can't telll you at the moment! Maybe tomorrow, when it might be sorted.....
January 20, 2007 9:39 am
tedwinder wrote:
OK. I'm afraid I can't tell you yet. But its to do with merging.....
Well I know it already then 
I can't wait to talk to your side of the team, we're so happy to be merging. We have a few ideas of how the merge is going to work, but I think that we should definately talk to you before we do anything, so that everyone approves of the ideas before we do anything, and we want to know your ideas of course.
Proud member of the Orange team!
Let's go into theAmazon. 
January 20, 2007 1:27 pm
January 20, 2007 2:50 pm
January 21, 2007 10:22 am
Kar-ma wrote:
whatever you say.... http://e.deviantart.com/emoticons/b/blankstare.gif
Edit:
isn't
Yeah, the ": |" isn't straight-mouthed enough. , naw I need something like this:
January 21, 2007 9:10 pm
alej744 wrote:
Kar-ma wrote:whatever you say.... http://e.deviantart.com/emoticons/b/blankstare.gif
Edit:
Yeah, the ": |" isn't straight-mouthed enough.
Yah, I like that one better too.
Altough I also do like this guy.
January 22, 2007 12:46 am
January 22, 2007 8:54 pm
spam |spam| noun 1 ( Spam) trademark a canned meat product made mainly from ham. 2 irrelevant or inappropriate messages sent on the Internet to a large number of recipients. verb [ trans. ] send the same message indiscriminately to (large numbers of recipients) on the Internet. DERIVATIVES spammer noun
they had been posting NOTHING. just "hey guys we have info, but we wont tell you"
irrelevant messages.
I called it spam.
If you find my post irrelevant thats up to you. But I made a valid point. Their posts had no meaning, only hype. My post had meaning, if nothing else but to point out that they had not (at the time) given ANY real info.
Green Team 4Lyfe
January 22, 2007 9:01 pm
onerythym wrote:
spam |spam| noun 1 ( Spam) trademark a canned meat product made mainly from ham. 2 irrelevant or inappropriate messages sent on the Internet to a large number of recipients. verb [ trans. ] send the same message indiscriminately to (large numbers of recipients) on the Internet. DERIVATIVES spammer noun
they had been posting NOTHING. just "hey guys we have info, but we wont tell you"
irrelevant messages.
I called it spam.
If you find my post irrelevant thats up to you. But I made a valid point. Their posts had no meaning, only hype. My post had meaning, if nothing else but to point out that they had not (at the time) given ANY real info.
Now that is thinking like a laywer 
January 23, 2007 2:14 am
February 3, 2007 1:55 am
Page 1